Reviewed and updated 26 September 2026 by the SolarPanelsForFarms.uk team.
Agrivoltaics — also called solar sharing or dual-use solar — is the practice of designing a solar PV installation so the land beneath the panels remains productive for grazing, pollinator habitat or even compatible crop cultivation. It is the most credible answer to the food-vs-energy land debate around large UK solar farms, and the government’s 2025 Solar Roadmap and 2026 Land Use Framework both point towards designs that keep land farmed.
Is agrivoltaics actually used in the UK?
Yes, on a small scale. The CMS expert guide to agrivoltaics reported that as of April 2025 there were 15 commercial operational agrivoltaic projects in the UK, most of them generating between 1 MW and 5 MW, and noted that UK legislation has no formal definition of agrivoltaics. Sheep grazing under ground-mounted arrays is the most common form: the government's Solar Roadmap (June 2025) notes that many solar projects are designed to enable continued livestock grazing.
The national picture is about potential rather than current output. University of Sheffield research (February 2025), published in Applied Energy, estimated that agrivoltaics could in principle supply more than four times the UK's electricity demand while the land stays farmed, and named East and South-East England (Cambridgeshire, Essex, Lincolnshire) as the best-suited areas. The Solar Roadmap (June 2025) calls agrivoltaics — the integration of solar with arable farming — "a rapidly developing industry". Our article could agrivoltaics power the UK? weighs that evidence.
Why agrivoltaics matters in 2026
Planning policy steers ground-mounted solar towards lower-grade land. Best and most versatile (BMV) land is grades 1, 2 and 3a, and government guidance on development on agricultural land (updated July 2026) requires councils to consult Natural England on proposals likely to lose 20 hectares or more of it that are not in line with the development plan. Agrivoltaics does not change a field's grade, but it changes the argument: if the land stays agriculturally productive, much of the food-vs-energy trade-off falls away. The Solar Roadmap asks developers who propose BMV land to justify it and to avoid, mitigate and, where necessary, compensate for impacts, and the 2026 Land Use Framework says BMV development may have potential for multifunctionality "such as through agrivoltaic systems".
What 2026 land-use policy says about agrivoltaics
The Land Use Framework for England, published in May 2026, is the clearest statement yet of how government expects farmland and energy to share space. It projects land used for solar and wind at about 129,000 hectares by 2035 and 155,000 hectares by 2050 — roughly 1% of England's land and 2% of its utilised agricultural area — and expects some of that land to stay in food production. It names continued livestock grazing and agrivoltaics as the ways that happens, and it frames its commitment to protect BMV farmland around permanent land-use change.
For a farm, the practical reading is simple: a project designed from the outset to keep the land grazed or cropped fits the direction of policy better than one that takes a field out of farming for the life of a lease. It does not guarantee consent, and it does not unlock a special grant, but it gives the planning case something concrete to stand on.
How much electricity agrivoltaic land generates in the UK
Agrivoltaic arrays are ground-mounted, so they can be set at the best tilt for the site rather than following a roof. EU PVGIS data for 1 kWp of south-facing panels at the optimum angle (SARAH3, 14% system losses, queried 26 September 2026) shows how location changes annual output:
| Location | Optimum tilt | kWh per kWp a year |
|---|---|---|
| Exeter, Devon | 39° | 1,054 |
| Peterborough, Cambridgeshire | 41° | 1,041 |
| York, North Yorkshire | 42° | 974 |
| Shrewsbury, Shropshire | 40° | 972 |
| Aberdeen | 43° | 894 |
Two cautions. Wider row spacing for grazing or machinery mainly reduces how much capacity a field can hold, so compare layouts on total kWh per hectare as well as per kWp. And vertical east–west bifacial designs, used where machinery must pass between rows, produce a flatter daily profile and a different annual total, so ask for a model of the actual layout.
Three practical UK agrivoltaic models
1. Sheep grazing under elevated panels
Standard ground-mount frames with enough clearance below the lower panel edge for sheep to pass. Sheep — typically hardy, low-stature breeds such as Welsh Mules, Romney, Shetland or Suffolk-cross — graze freely between the rows, keeping vegetation down and removing the need for mechanical mowing. Stocking density is modestly reduced versus equivalent open pasture because of the panel footprint and access spacing, so there is a small grazing-output trade-off offset by significant solar income. This is the most widely proven UK model.
2. Pollinator-friendly wildflower ground cover
Solar arrays planted with native UK wildflower seed mixes — Yellow Rattle, Common Knapweed, Birdsfoot Trefoil, Field Scabious. This generates strong biodiversity outcomes, helps deliver mandatory Biodiversity Net Gain (in force since 2024 under the Environment Act), can qualify for SFI pollinator and wildlife actions, and reduces grass-mowing costs to essentially zero. Independent post-construction biodiversity surveys at solar sites have generally recorded higher pollinator and invertebrate counts than the previous intensive arable use.
3. Elevated arrays with shade-tolerant crops
Continental European agrivoltaics — common in Germany, Italy and France — uses panel arrays raised well above head height to allow cropping below. UK trials are underway with soft fruits (raspberries, blackcurrants) and salad/leaf production. Capital cost is materially higher than a standard ground mount, with fewer kWp per hectare, but justified where high-value protected cropping is the realistic alternative land use.
Solar grazing in the UK
Solar grazing — running livestock to manage vegetation on and between solar arrays instead of mowing — is the most evidenced and most widely deployed agrivoltaic practice in the UK, which is why it is the realistic starting point for most farms. The Solar Roadmap (June 2025) notes that many solar projects are already designed to enable continued livestock grazing.
Which sheep breeds? Hardy, low-stature breeds that will not damage cabling or rub against the frames are preferred — Welsh Mules, Romney, Shetland and Suffolk-cross are commonly used. Larger, taller or boisterous breeds are generally avoided. Frames are set with enough clearance beneath the lower panel edge for ewes to move and graze freely between rows.
Stocking and welfare. Expect a modest reduction in stocking versus equivalent open pasture, because the panel footprint and access spacing take some grazing area out of play — model this as a small productivity trade-off rather than a fixed national figure, since it varies by layout and grass quality. The welfare upside is real: panels give sheep shelter from sun, wind and driving rain, and partial shade keeps the sward greener for longer in dry spells.
Who manages the grazing? Either the host farmer runs their own flock, or a neighbouring grazier takes a grazing licence — a common arrangement on larger developer-built sites that keeps land in genuine agricultural use and supports the planning and SFI case. Fencing, water and a simple grazing plan are the practical essentials. See our sheep farm solar guide for breed-level detail.
What agrivoltaics costs in the UK
The government's solar cost statistics (DESNZ, 2025/26) cover MCS-certified installations up to 50 kW and do not separate out agrivoltaic designs; in that data the median installed cost of a 10–50 kW system was about £1,262 per kW. Ground-mounted farm arrays are usually far larger and priced per project, so anyone quoting a precise national £/kWp figure for agrivoltaics is estimating. What can be said with confidence is the direction of cost for each design, relative to a conventional ground mount:
| System type | Cost per kWp vs solar-only ground mount | Capacity per hectare | Best-fit farm |
|---|---|---|---|
| Rooftop (barn / shed) | No land cost; the roof and structure decide | n/a (roof area) | Any farm with large roofs and high daytime use |
| Standard ground-mount (solar-only) | Baseline | Highest | Lower-grade land with no continuing crop use |
| Sheep-grazing agri-PV | Similar to slightly higher | Similar to slightly lower | Livestock farms keeping land in grazing |
| Elevated crop agri-PV | Materially higher (taller, stronger frames) | Lowest | High-value soft fruit and salad growers |
Relative comparisons, not measured costs. Get the agrivoltaic and solar-only layouts priced side by side for the same field. For the rooftop route, see our guide to rooftop solar on farm buildings.
Illustrative worked example (model only — not a specific client)
The figures below are an illustrative model to show how the income streams stack — they are not a real project and are not a guarantee of returns. Run your own site-specific numbers before deciding.
| Income / cost stream (modelled) | Indicative Year 1 |
|---|---|
| Solar generation savings (≈1 MW, high self-consumption) | Largest stream — varies with tariff & self-use |
| SEG export income on surplus | Secondary stream (depends on SEG tariff) |
| Stacked SFI / stewardship actions (per ha) | Adds per-hectare income — rate per SFI handbook |
| Reduced grazing output (opportunity cost) | Small deduction |
| Net effect | Generation savings + SFI typically outweigh the grazing trade-off |
The exact figures turn on your irradiance, self-consumption percentage, electricity and SEG tariffs, and which SFI actions you qualify for — all of which are site-specific and (for SFI) updated periodically at gov.uk. Treat this as a structure to model against, not a quoted return.
Planning permission for agrivoltaics
Most ground-mount solar above small thresholds needs full planning permission, and agrivoltaics is no exception — but the dual-use design is genuinely easier to consent than solar-only. Three reasons carry weight with planners: (1) the land stays agriculturally productive, which directly answers the BMV land objection that blocks solar-only schemes; (2) biodiversity ground cover helps deliver mandatory Biodiversity Net Gain (Environment Act, in force 2024); and (3) the Solar Roadmap (June 2025) describes agrivoltaics as a rapidly developing industry that government is working to understand, while the Land Use Framework for England (May 2026) names it as a way to keep farming alongside solar.
That said, consent is never automatic, especially on better-grade land — a credible, evidenced continuing agricultural use (a real grazing or cropping plan, not just a stated intention) is what strengthens the case. See our guide to planning permission for farm solar and solar on agricultural land planning rules for the detail.
SFI payment stacking — earnings per hectare
The commercial appeal of agrivoltaics is the income stack: generation savings and SEG export plus Sustainable Farming Incentive (SFI) actions on the land beneath and around the panels, minus a modest grazing trade-off. Eligible actions can include pollinator and wildflower ground cover, managed grassland and hedgerow management around the perimeter. SFI action rates are set in the current SFI handbook and change periodically, so confirm the live per-hectare figures and current scheme status at gov.uk before relying on any number.
- ✓ Pollinator / wildflower ground cover actions — per-hectare annual payments for biodiversity-rich ground cover under and between arrays
- ✓ Grassland and soil actions — for sheep-grazed agrivoltaic sites kept in managed grassland
- ✓ Hedgerow management — per-metre annual payments for hedgerows around solar field perimeters
- ✓ Countryside Stewardship capital grants where the project delivers measurable biodiversity uplift
This stacking is why an owned agrivoltaic system can out-earn leasing the same land to a solar developer: a land lease pays a fixed, low-risk rent but surrenders the generation value, and usually the SFI income, for the length of the lease. Agrivoltaics keeps the land farming and captures all three streams — at the cost of capital outlay and management.
Limitations of agrivoltaics
- ✗ Higher capital cost per kWp than a standard ground mount (elevated or wider-spaced frames)
- ✗ Lower capacity per hectare than solar-only, because rows are spaced for animals, machinery or light
- ✗ Modestly reduced grazing density versus equivalent open pasture
- ✗ Specialist mowing or grazing management required to maintain wildflower mixes — not just standard agricultural practice
- ✗ Some shade-sensitive crops (cereals, brassicas) genuinely unsuitable beneath panels
- ✗ Usually a longer payback than rooftop farm solar, which avoids land and elevated-frame costs
Related reading
- • Solar grazing & solar for sheep farms
- • Could agrivoltaics power the UK? What the evidence says
- • Solar panels on farm buildings — the rooftop alternative
- • Biggest UK solar farms — top 10 + regional
- • 1-acre solar farm cost and income
- • Solar farm profit & income per acre — lease vs build
- • Farm solar grants UK 2026
- • Planning permission for farm solar